GP Industries v. Eran Industries et al

Filing 398

ORDER - The Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice 397 is adopted, and the relief requested therein is granted. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Amended Complaints and all claims in both actions (8:06CV50 and8:06CV51) are dismissed with prejudice. The parties will pay their own costs and attorney fees; and the Clerk of the Court is ordered to file this Order in both cases (8:06CV50 and 8:06CV51). Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (KBJ)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA GP INDUSTRIES, LLC, a Nebraska Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff and Counter Defendant, v. JAMES E. BACHMAN, Defendant, ERAN INDUSTRIES, INC., a Nebraska Corporation, Defendant, Counter Claimant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. LANCE D. BAILEY, et al., Third-Party Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 8:06CV50 ORDER CASE NO. 8:06CV51 ERAN INDUSTRIES, INC., a Nebraska Corporation, Plaintiff, v. GP INDUSTRIES, LLC, a Nebraska Limited Liability Company, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (Filing No. 397). The Court finds that the stipulation satisfies the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), and should be approved. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (Filing No. 397) is adopted, and the relief requested therein is granted; 2. 3. All pending motions are denied as moot; The Amended Complaints and all claims in both actions (8:06CV50 and 8:06CV51) are dismissed with prejudice; 4. 5. The parties will pay their own costs and attorney fees; and The Clerk of the Court is ordered to file this Order in both cases (8:06CV50 and 8:06CV51). DATED this 2nd day of December, 2008. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?