Oppliger et al v. United States of America

Filing 69

ORDER - The United States' Motion for Extension of Remaining Deadlines of Progression Order (Filing No. 67 in case No. 8:06CV750; Filing No. 46 in case No. 8:08CV530) is granted as follows. The remaining deadlines contained in the February 6, 2009, Order Setting Final Schedule for Progression of Case and May 8, 2009, Amended Order are stayed. The pretrial conference and trial are cancelled. The parties shall have ten (10) days from the date the court rules on the pending motion for s ummary judgment in which to schedule a telephone planning conference with the court, if necessary. Counsel for James H. Oppliger and Gayle Oppliger shall contact the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge within such time period to schedule th e telephone planning conference. James H. Oppliger and Gayle Oppliger shall have to on or before December 21, 2009, to respond to the United States' Motion for Summary Judgment. The United States shall have to on or before January 4, 2010, to file a reply. Despite the stay of this case, the United States shall respond on or before December 14, 2009, to discovery requests served on November 13, 2009. Member Cases: 8:06-cv-00750-JFB-TDT, 8:08-cv-00530-JFB-TDT. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (KBJ)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JAMES H. OPPLIGER and GAYLE OPPLIGER, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. JAMES H. OPPLIGER and GAYLE OPPLIGER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:06CV750 ORDER 8:08CV530 ORDER This matter is before the court on the United States' Motion for Extension of Remaining Deadlines of Progression Order (Filing No. 67 in case No. 8:06CV750; Filing No. 46 in case No. 8:08CV530). James H. Oppliger and Gayle Oppliger have filed a response (Filing No. 68 in case No. 8:06CV750; Filing No. 47 in case No. 8:08CV530) to the motion indicating the parties have come to an agreement regarding progression of the case. Upon consideration and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The United States' Motion for Extension of Remaining Deadlines of Progression Order (Filing No. 67 in case No. 8:06CV750; Filing No. 46 in case No. 8:08CV530) is granted as follows. 2. The remaining deadlines contained in the February 6, 2009, Order Setting Final Schedule for Progression of Case and May 8, 2009, Amended Order are stayed. The pretrial conference and trial are cancelled. 3. The parties shall have ten (10) days from the date the court rules on the pending motion for summary judgment in which to schedule a telephone planning conference with the court, if necessary. Counsel for James H. Oppliger and Gayle Oppliger shall contact the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge within such time period to schedule the telephone planning conference. 4. James H. Oppliger and Gayle Oppliger shall have to on or before December 21, 2009, to respond to the United States' Motion for Summary Judgment. The United States shall have to on or before January 4, 2010, to file a reply. 5. Despite the stay of this case, the United States shall respond on or before December 14, 2009, to discovery requests served on November 13, 2009. DATED this 7th day of December, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge *This opinion m a y contain hyperlinks to other docum e n ts or W e b sites. The U.S. District Court for th e District of Nebraska does not endorse, recom m e n d , approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services o r products they provide on their W e b sites. Likewise, the court has no agreem e n ts with any of these third p a r tie s or their W e b sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any h yp e r lin k . Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to som e other site does not affect t h e opinion of the court. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?