Denenberg v. Djordjevic
Filing
157
ORDER granting 156 Joint Oral Motion to Continue Pretrial Conference. Pretrial Conference set for 9/16/2011 at 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TEL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
STEVEN M. DENENBERG,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DOCTORS SURGERY CENTER,
d/b/a Surgeontothestars.com,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:07CV150
ORDER
This matter is before the court after a telephone conference with counsel for the
parties on September 7, 2011. Norman H. Denenberg represented the plaintiff and Edwin
R. Cottone represented Doctors Surgery Center. Both counsel were unprepared to conduct
the previously scheduled pretrial conference on this date. Following a discussion with
counsel the parties’ joint oral motion to continue the pretrial conference is granted as follows,
IT IS ORDERED:
The court will hold a Final Pretrial Conference with counsel on September 16, 2011,
at 10:00 a.m. (Central Daylight Time), in chambers, Suite 2271, Roman L. Hruska United
States Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. The final pretrial conference
shall be attended by lead counsel for represented parties.
Prior to the pretrial
conference, the parties shall jointly complete all items as directed in NECivR 16.2. Failure
to participate in preparing the Final Pretrial Order or attending the Final Pretrial Conference
may result in dismissal of a party’s claims or defenses pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41.
Counsel shall provide the court with a final agreed upon draft of the pretrial order no later
than noon on September 15, 2011. Such final draft shall be provided to the undersigned
magistrate judge by means of a fax or e-mail.
DATED this 7th day of September, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?