Sampson v. Schenck et al

Filing 233

ORDER denying as moot the defendant's 103 and 106 Motions for Summary Judgment, without prejudice to reassertion. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA NICHOLAS SAMPSON, Plaintiff, v. EARL SCHENCK, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

8:07CV155

ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. The plaintiff was recently granted leave to amend his complaint to add parties. Filing No. 228, Order; Filing No. 230, Amended Complaint. This is an action for deprivation of constitutional rights brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In their brief opposing plaintiff's motion to amend,

defendants stated that they would seek leave to amend their pending motions for summary judgment if the amended complaint were filed. See Filing No. 210, Brief at 6. Accordingly, the court finds the motions for summary judgment should be denied as moot without prejudice to refiling. Deadlines for progression of the case will be amended by the magistrate judge in due course. IT IS ORDERED the defendant's motions for summary judgment (Filing Nos. 103 and 106) are denied as moot, without prejudice to reassertion. DATED this 8th day of June, 2009. BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge