Sampson v. Schenck et al
Filing
450
ORDER - Defendants' William Lambert and Charles OCallaghans Motion to Quash 440 is granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(KBJ)
-TDT Sampson v. Schenck et al
Doc. 450
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA NICHOLAS SAMPSON, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
8:07CV155
v. EARL SCHENCK, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the court on the defendants William Lambert and Charles O'Callaghan's Motion to Quash (Filing No. 440). The plaintiff filed a brief (Filing No. 443) and an index of evidence (Filing No. 444) in opposition to the motion. The moving defendants filed an affidavit (Filing No. 445) and an index of evidence (Filing No. 446) in reply. The court held a telephone conference with the parties on March 3, 2011, to hear argument on the motion. As discussed during the telephone conference, the court finds the plaintiff failed to sustain his burden of making a threshold showing of relevance to conduct the deposition of Corey O'Brien. Upon consideration,
IT IS ORDERED: William Lambert and Charles O'Callaghan's Motion to Quash (Filing No. 440) is granted. DATED this 3rd day of March, 2011. BY THE COURT:
s/Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?