Sampson v. Schenck et al

Filing 503

ORDER denying the Defendants' 501 Motion to Strike Sampson's Supplemental Brief. The defendants shall have until January 31, 2013, to further reply in support of their motions (Filing Nos. 485 and 488 ) seeking consolidation of thi s case with the case of Livers v. Schenck, et al., 8:08CV107, for the purpose of trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a). The defendants shall have until January 28, 2013, to file a reply in support of their motion to compel a Rule 35 examination (Filing No. 494 ) of the plaintiff. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
NICHOLAS SAMPSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
INVESTIGATOR EARL SCHENK, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:07CV155
ORDER

This matter is before the court after a telephone conference with the parties on
January 25, 2013, regarding progression of this case. Maren L. Chaloupka represented
the plaintiff. Stephanie A. Caldwell, Kimberly K. Sturzenegger, and Timothy K. Dolan,
represented the defendants. David W. Kofoed represented himself. Based on the
conference,

IT IS ORDERED:
1.

The defendants’ Joint Motion to Strike Sampson’s Supplemental Brief (Filing

No. 501) is denied.
2.

The defendants shall have until January 31, 2013, to further reply in support

of their motions (Filing Nos. 485 and 488) seeking consolidation of this case with the case
of Livers v. Schenck, et al., 8:08CV107, for the purpose of trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 42(a).
3.

The defendants shall have until January 28, 2013, to file a reply in support

of their motion to compel a Rule 35 examination (Filing No. 494) of the plaintiff.
4.

Motions for Summary Judgment. Motions for summary judgment shall be

filed not later than April 16, 2013. See NECivR 56.1 and 7.1.
5.

Discovery Deadlines.
a.

Deposition Deadline. All depositions, whether or not they are

intended to be used at trial, shall be completed by June 3, 2013.
b.

Written Discovery Deadline. All interrogatories, requests for

admission and requests for production or inspection, whether or not they are

intended to be used at trial, shall be served sufficiently early to allow rule
time response before the deposition deadline. Counsel may stipulate to
extensions of time to respond to discovery requests in accordance with Fed.
R. Civ. P. 29, but such extensions shall not extend any of the dates in this
order; any request to extend the deadlines of this order shall be sought by
motion.
DATED this 28th day of January, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge

2