City of Omaha v. Figg Bridge Engineers et al

Filing 118

ORDER granting 117 Motion to Extend Time to Reply to Defendant's Brief in Opposition to the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 106 . The Plaintiff shall reply to the Defendant's response by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before January 8, 2009. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JAE, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff, v. FIGG BRIDGE ENGINEERS, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 8:07CV157 ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Filing No. 117). The Plaintiff requests additional time, until January 8, 2009, to reply to the Defendant's brief in opposition to the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Defendant does not oppose the motion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Filing No. 117) is granted; and 2. The Plaintiff shall reply to the Defendant's response by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before January 8, 2009. DATED this 30th day of December, 2008. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?