E-P International Distribution v. Sav-Rx

Filing 226

ORDER denying 216 the third-party plaintiff/defendant A&A Drug Company, Inc; Defendant Sav-RX and intervenor defendant James Barta (collectively referred to as movants') Motion in Limine as set forth herein. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (copy mailed) (MKR)

-FG3 E-P International Distribution v. Sav-Rx

Doc. 226

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA E-P INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION, INC., a Barbados corporation, Plaintiff, v. A&A DRUG COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation, and SAV-RX, LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company, Defendants, JAMES BARTA, Defendant-Intervenor. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

8:07CV186

ORDER

A&A DRUG COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. BARBARA RIGBY and MALCOLM RIGBY, Third-Party Defendants.

This matter is before the court on a motion in limine filed by third-party plaintiff/defendant A&A Drug Company, Inc.; defendant Sav-Rx; and intervenor defendant James Barta (collectively referred to as movants). Filing No. 216. The movants ask this court to rule on various issues that might occur during trial and to preclude testimony regarding these issues. Plaintiff E-P International and the third-party defendants Barbara Rigby and Malcom Rigby oppose the motion in limine, arguing that rulings are premature

Dockets.Justia.com

at this time and that much of the evidence is in fact relevant. The court agrees with the plaintiff and the Rigbys. The court will deny the motion in limine as premature. All issues relate to evidentiary matters that will occur at trial. The court will listen to the evidence as it develops. Movants are free to make a motion at the relevant time and the court will make a ruling. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion in limine, Filing No. 216, is denied as set forth herein. DATED this 10th day of November, 2010. BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion m a y contain hyperlinks to other docum e n ts or W e b sites. The U.S. District Court for th e District of Nebraska does not endorse, recom m e n d , approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services o r products they provide on their W e b sites. Likewise, the court has no agreem e n ts with any of these third p a r tie s or their W e b sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any h yp e r lin k . Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to som e other site does not affect t h e opinion of the court. 2