Brehm et al v. Engle et al

Filing 445

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiffs' motion for preliminary approval of proposed partial settlement agreement 436 is granted. The proposed partial settlement agreement with defendant Stark Winter (Filing No. 440) is preliminarily approved. A Fairness Hearing is set for January 20, 2011, at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 3, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. A Notice of Proposed Partial Settlement of Class Action & Fairness Hearing in substantially t he same form as that approved in Filing No. 321 is approved. Within 7 days of the date of this order, class counsel shall mail (in the name of the clerk of court, by first class mail, postage prepaid) the Notice of Proposed Partial Settlement of Cla ss Action & Fairness Hearing, in substantially the form approved by the court, to all class members. Within 7 days of the date of the mailing of the notice, class counsel shall file an affidavit identifying the persons to whom notice has been mailed. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KBJ)

Download PDF
rD B T 5 4 co 4. D IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LYLE BREHM, on behalf of Willard F. Brehm, Gladys M. Brehm, the Willard F. Brehm Revocable Trust and the Gladys M. Brehm Revocable Trust, REX W ELDON, on behalf of Nancy Weldon, Robert Clark Weldon and the Robert Clark Weldon and Nancy Weldon Trust, JILL SCHUNEMAN, on behalf of herself and the Jill Schuneman Living Trust, and DAVID BUCKLEY, on behalf of himself, the Robert L. McKissick Irrevocable Trust and the Brenda L. Buckley Revocable Trust, collectively on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. REBECCA ENGLE, BRIAN SCHUSTER, ENGLE & SCHUSTER FINANCIAL, INC., AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION, ROYAL PALM CAPITAL GROUP, INC., GERALD PARKER, JOHN BOYCE, GERALDINE MAGALNICK, LIANA DOBARGANES HARRINGTON and STARK WINTER SCHENKEIN & CO., LLP, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:07CV254 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs' motion for preliminary and final approval of a proposed partial settlement agreement with defendants Stark Winter Schenkein & Co., LLP ("Stark Winter") pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23. Filing No. 436. This is a class action for securities fraud pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 77 et seq. The case has been certified as a class action. Filing No. 299. mc . a i t suJ . s t ekco o D In considering preliminary approval, the court makes a preliminary evaluation of the fairness of the settlement, prior to notice. Manual of Complex Litigation (Fourth) § 21.632 (2010); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e). First, the court must make a preliminary determination of the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the settlement terms and must direct the preparation of notice of the proposed settlement and the date of the fairness hearing. Id. After an agreement is preliminarily approved, the second step of the process ensues: notice is given to the class members of a hearing, at which time class members and the settling parties may be heard with respect to final court approval. Id. A district court is required to consider four factors in making a final determination that a settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate: (1) the merits of the plaintiff's case, weighed against the terms of the settlement; (2) the defendant's financial condition; (3) the complexity and expense of further litigation; and (4) the amount of opposition to the settlement. In re Wireless Telephone Federal Cost Recovery Fees Litigation, 396 F.3d 922, 931 (8th Cir. 2005). A court may also consider procedural fairness to ensure the settlement is "not the product of fraud or collusion." Id. at 934. The experience and opinion of counsel on both sides may be considered, as well as whether a settlement resulted from arm's length negotiations, and whether a skilled mediator was involved. See DeBoer v. Mellon Mortgage Co., 64 F.3d 1171, 1178 (8th Cir. 1995). A court may also consider the settlement's timing, including whether discovery proceeded to the point where all parties were fully aware of the merits. See City P'ship Co. v. Atlantic Acquisition Ltd. P'ship, 100 F.3d 1041, 1043 (1st Cir. 1996). The court has reviewed the proposed settlement agreement, Filing No. 440, Index of Evid. at 4-9, Settlement and Release Agreement (Doc # 440, Page ID ## 4428-32). 2 Lead plaintiffs have shown that counsel for the parties have mediated this dispute and have negotiated the terms of a proposed settlement that maximizes Stark Winter's financial contribution. Filing No. 438, Index of Evid., Ex. A, Affidavit of Gregory Scaglione; Ex. B, Affidavit of J.L. Spray. Lead plaintiffs have also shown that the proposed settlement in the best interests of the plaintiff Class, based on the claims and defenses in this action, its procedural posture, the anticipated time and expense of protracted litigation, and the fact that the insurance proceeds available are limited and are part of a "wasting" policy that diminishes as defense costs are incurred. See id. The proposed settlement between the plaintiff class and defendant Stark Winter appears, on preliminary review, to be within the range of reasonableness and, accordingly, the court finds the proposed partial settlement should be submitted to class members for their consideration and a fairness hearing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e), after which an order of final approval will issue. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiffs' motion for preliminary approval of proposed partial settlement agreement (Filing No. 436) is granted. 2. The proposed partial settlement agreement with defendant Stark Winter (Filing No. 440) is preliminarily approved. 3. A Fairness Hearing is set for January 20, 2011, at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 3, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. 4. A Notice of Proposed Partial Settlement of Class Action & Fairness Hearing in substantially the same form as that approved in Filing No. 321 is approved. 5. Within 7 days of the date of this order, class counsel shall mail (in the name of the clerk of court, by first class mail, postage prepaid) the Notice of Proposed Partial 3 Settlement of Class Action & Fairness Hearing, in substantially the form approved by the court, to all class members. 6. Within 7 days of the date of the mailing of the notice, class counsel shall file an affidavit identifying the persons to whom notice has been mailed. DATED this 30th day of November, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/Joseph F. Bataillon CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE *This opinion m a y contain hyperlinks to other docum e n ts or W e b sites. The U.S. District Court for th e District of Nebraska does not endorse, recom m e n d , approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services o r products they provide on their W e b sites. Likewise, the court has no agreem e n ts with any of these third p a r tie s or their W e b sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any h yp e r lin k . Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to som e other site does not affect t h e opinion of the court. 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?