Blair v. Omaha, City of et al

Filing 321

ORDER that the plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time is held in abeyance 319 until September 7, 2010. The plaintiff shall have until September 7, 2010, to supplement the motion to include specific information about the type and length of extension(s) sought. Case Management Deadline set for 9/7/2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)

-TDT Blair v. Omaha, City of et al

Doc. 321

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA STEVEN R. BLAIR, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF OMAHA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

8:07CV295 ORDER

This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Filing No. 319). Counsel's affidavit (Filing No. 319-1) was attached to the motion. The plaintiff's counsel seeks an extension of unspecified deadlines for an unspecified amount of time due to a "family medical emergency". Based on the case filings, the court is unable to determine whether good cause exists, not because of the reason for the extension, but because there is no indication for the type or length of extension sought. consideration, Upon

IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Filing No. 319) is held in

abeyance until September 7, 2010. 2. The plaintiff shall have until September 7, 2010, to supplement the motion

to include specific information about the type and length of extension(s) sought. DATED this 24th day of August, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Dockets.Justia.com