Proxibid v. BigGavel.com et al
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF AND EVIDENCE 31 that Defendants' motion for an extension of time to reply is granted. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)
-TDT Proxibid v. BigGavel.com et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PROXIBID, INC., a Nebraska Corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BIGGAVEL.COM, an Idaho Corporation, ) ALAN ARMSTRONG, DOROTHY ) ARMSTRONG, ALAN ARMSTRONG. JR., ) CALPOP.COM, INC., a California Corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)
CASE NO. 8:07-CV-396 ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF AND EVIDENCE
This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Second Motion for an Extension of Time to file a brief and evidence opposing Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Filing No. 31). The brief and evidence were filed contemporaneously with the motion. See Filing No. 30. The court finds that the motion should be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion for an extension of time to reply is granted. DATED this 8th day of February 2008. BY THE COURT s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 7th day of February, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which sent a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following person: Kenneth W. Hartman Jill Robb Ackerman James E. O'Connor BAIRD HOLD LLP 1500 Woodmen Tower Omaha, NE 68102-2068
______________________________ s/ Howard Belodoff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?