Matschiner et al v. Lewis et al

Filing 94

ORDER - Alan L. Lewis's motion to move the trial date (Filing No. 88 ) is granted as set forth herein. The remaining deadlines contained in the Order Setting Final Schedule for Progression of Case (Filing No. 79 ) are stayed. The pretrial con ference and trial are cancelled. The parties shall have ten (10) working days from the date the court rules on the pending motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 90 ), in which to schedule a telephone planning conference with the court, if necessary. Counsel for the plaintiffs shall contact the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge within such time period to schedule the telephone planning conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copies mailed) (MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA KATHERINE MATSCHINER and KRISTINA MATSCHINER, Plaintiffs, vs. ALAN L. LEWIS, HARTFORD LIFE, INC., and HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

8:07CV435 ORDER

This matter is before the court on Alan L. Lewis's motion to move the trial date (Filing No. 88). Mr. Lewis seeks to extend the trial date until after resolution of issues related to the claims against the other defendants. Additionally, on June 16, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 90) against Mr. Lewis. The court finds good cause exists to stay the deadlines and trial in this case until resolution of the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, Mr. Lewis's motion is granted. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. forth herein. 2. The remaining deadlines contained in the Order Setting Final Schedule for Alan L. Lewis's motion to move the trial date (Filing No. 88) is granted as set

Progression of Case (Filing No. 79) are stayed. The pretrial conference and trial are cancelled. 3. The parties shall have ten (10) working days from the date the court rules

on the pending motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 90), in which to schedule a telephone planning conference with the court, if necessary. Counsel for the plaintiffs shall contact the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge within such time period to schedule the telephone planning conference. DATED this 17th day of June, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge