Securities and Exchange Commission v Behrens, et al
Filing
372
ORDER - The receiver is directed not to destroy any files or records until further order of the Court. The receiver is directed to respond to Behren's motion (filing 371 ), specifically addressing: (a) Behrens' stated grounds for resist ing destruction of the documents, and (b) whether it is feasible to transfer the documents to Behrens or an associate of Behrens. The receiver's response shall be filed, absent any request for extension, on or before November 22, 2013. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
8:08-CV-13
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
BRYAN S. BEHRENS, et al.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on defendant Behrens' Emergency
Motion to Stop Destruction of Documents (filing 371). The Court will direct
the receiver not to destroy any of the receivership documents until Behrens'
motion is disposed of. The Court will also direct the receiver to respond to
Behrens' motion, specifically addressing (1) Behrens' grounds for resisting
destruction of the documents, and (2) whether it is feasible to transfer the
documents to the possession of Behrens or an associate of Behrens.
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The receiver is directed not to destroy any files or records
until further order of the Court.
2.
The receiver is directed to respond to Behren's motion
(filing 371), specifically addressing:
(a)
(b)
3.
Behrens' stated grounds for resisting destruction of
the documents, and
whether it is feasible to transfer the documents to
Behrens or an associate of Behrens.
The receiver's response shall be filed, absent any request
for extension, on or before November 22, 2013.
Dated this 8th day of November, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?