Gomez et al v Tyson Foods
Filing
123
ORDER - For the reasons stated in the conference with counsel, the Motion to Quash Subpoena of Francisco Tostado in his Capacity as a Union Representative for UFCW Local 222 (Filing No. 114 ) is denied. The deposition may take place as scheduled with the caveat that the deposition will be limited to three (3) hours. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JOSE A. GOMEZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
TYSON FOODS, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:08CV21
ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the interested parties’ Motion to Quash
Subpoena of Francisco Tostado in his Capacity as a Union Representative for UFCW
Local 222 (Filing No. 114). The interested parties filed a brief (Filing No. 114-1) and index
of evidence (Filing No. 114-11) in support of the motion. The plaintiffs filed a brief (Filing
No. 118) in support of the motion. The defendant filed a brief (Filing No. 121) and index
of evidence (Filing No. 122) in opposition of the motion.
The court held a conference by telephone in chambers on August 7, 2012, to
discuss the motion. Allison D. Balus and Thomas E. Johnson, counsel for the defendant,
and Jay M. Smith, counsel for the interested parties, were present in chambers. Daniel
Arciniegas, Michael Hamilton, Brian P. McCafferty, and Candis A. McGowan, counsel for
the plaintiffs, and Evangeline C. Paschal, counsel for the defendant, participated by
telephone.
For the reasons stated in the conference with counsel, the Motion to Quash
Subpoena of Francisco Tostado in his Capacity as a Union Representative for UFCW
Local 222 (Filing No. 114) is denied. The deposition may take place as scheduled with the
caveat that the deposition will be limited to three (3) hours.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 7th day of August, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?