Gomez et al v Tyson Foods

Filing 58

ORDER - The Joint Motion to Extend the Scheduling Order 57 is granted as set forth in this Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (KBJ)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JOSE A. GOMEZ, JULIANA REYES, JUAN M. CRUZ, TED MCDONALD, CECILIA ORTIZ, AND MARIO CRUZ on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals, P l a i n ti f f s , vs. TYSON FOODS INC., d/b/a Tyson Fresh Meats, D efendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8 :0 8 C V 0 2 1 ORDER This matter is before the court on the parties' Joint Motion to Extend the Scheduling Order (Filing No. 57). The parties seek to extend the deadlines in this case regarding the plaintiffs' m otion for class certification under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23, pending the court's ruling on the defendant's m otion for partial summary judgment (Filing No. 47). Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Parties' deadline for discovery relating to class action certification shall be thirty (30) days following the court's ruling on the defendant's motion for partial summary judgment (Filing No. 47). 2. The plaintiffs' deadline to file a class action certification motion shall be forty-five (45) days following the court's ruling on the defendant's motion for partial summary judgment (Filing No. 47). 3. 4. The defendant shall have twenty-one (21) days following the filing of plaintiffs' The plaintiffs shall then have fourteen (14) days to file a reply brief in support of class action motion in which to file a response brief. class action certification. Dated this 9th day of March, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/Thom as D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?