Morales et al v. Greater Omaha Packing

Filing 93

ORDER - The plaintiffs' motions for leave to file a sur-reply brief (Filing No. 120 in 8:08CV161 and Filing No. 88 in 8:08CV88) are granted. The plaintiffs shall file sur-reply briefs on or before June 11, 2009. Defendant's response, if a ny, shall be filed on or before June 16, 2009. Case Management Deadline set for 6/16/2009 - Defendant's response to the plaintiffs sur-reply briefs due. Member Cases: 8:08-cv-00088-JFB-TDT, 8:08-cv-00161-JFB-TDT. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JAE)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JOSE MORALES, et al., Plaintiffs, and GABRIEL SANCHEZ CLAUDIO, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. GREATER OMAHA PACKING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:08CV88 8:08CV161 ORDER This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's motion for leave to file a sur-reply brief in response to the defendants' motion to dismiss, Filing No. 120 in 8:08CV161 and Filing No. 88 in 8:08CV88. The defendant has not opposed the motion. The court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. 2. 3. The plaintiffs' motions for leave to file a sur-reply brief (Filing No. 120 in 8:08CV161 and Filing No. 88 in 8:08CV88) are granted. The plaintiffs shall file sur-reply briefs on or before June 11, 2009. Defendant's response, if any, shall be filed on or before June 16, 2009. DATED this 9th day of June, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?