Cortez et al v. Nebraska Beef
Filing
270
ORDER that this matter is before the court following receipt of a jury questionnaire submitted by the parties in these two cases. The court has reviewed the same and finds as follows: The parties edited questionnaire will be sent to the prospective j urors selected for this case only if the parties questionnaire is received by the Clerk of Court on or before January 4, 2011. The court will request potential jurors to return the completed questionnaires on or before January 12, 2011. Second, ther e are numerous numbering mistakes in the current questionnaire. The parties are instructed to make sure the numbering in the revised questionnaire is numbered correctly without the use of duplicative numbers. The purpose of the pre-voir dire question s should be to elicit basic responses to general questions. With this in mind, counsel are asked to make the following changes to the currently numbered questions as listed in the order. The parties are free to submit a new questionnaire to the court with the above changes and are free to delete questions that are better designed if asked during voir dire. Member Cases: 8:08-cv-00090-JFB -TDT, 8:08-cv-00099-JFB -TDTOrdered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB, )
-TDT Cortez et al v. Nebraska Beef, Inc.
Doc. 270
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA FERMIN CORTEZ, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NEBRASKA BEEF, INC., and NEBRASKA BEEF, LTD., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
8:08CV90
ORDER
DAVID CHUOL, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, v. NEBRASKA BEEF, Ltd., Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
8:08CV99
ORDER
This matter is before the court following receipt of a jury questionnaire submitted by the parties in these two cases. The court has reviewed the same and finds as follows: 1. The parties' edited questionnaire will be sent to the prospective jurors selected for this case only if the parties' questionnaire is received by the Clerk of Court on or before January 4, 2011. The court will request potential jurors to return the completed
questionnaires on or before January 12, 2011.
Dockets.Justia.com
2. Second, there are numerous numbering mistakes in the current questionnaire. The parties are instructed to make sure the numbering in the revised questionnaire is numbered correctly without the use of duplicative numbers. 3. The purpose of the pre-voir dire questions should be to elicit basic responses to general questions. This process is not designed to obtain lengthy essays; it is not designed to confuse prospective jurors; and it is not designed to influence jurors about the case. During the actual voir dire process, counsel are free to ask relevant follow-up questions regarding basic responses to questions posed by the court and by the parties. W ith this in mind, counsel are asked to make the following changes to the currently numbered questions: a. No. 8 - eliminate "please explain, including your duties and" - The line should read: "If yes, describe your position and how many people you supervise(d)." b. c. d. e. No. 13 - eliminate the phrase: "If Yes, please explain:" No. 23 - eliminate the phrase: "If Yes, please explain:" No. 24 - eliminate the phrase: "If Yes, please explain:" No. 29 - after the phrase "If Yes," add the words: "Is your opinion (please circle your choice): positive or negative?" f. g. No. 30 - eliminate the phrase: "If Yes, please explain:" No. 31 - Edit the last line as follows: "Is you opinion of class action lawsuits (please circle your choice) positive, neutral or negative?" h. i. j. No. 32 - eliminate the phrase "If you disagree, please explain:" No. 34 - eliminate the phrase "If Yes, please explain:" No. 35 - after the phrase: "If Yes," add the words: "Is your opinion (please circle your choice): positive or negative?"
2
k.
No. 36 - (the first one) - after the phrase: "If Yes, what is your opinion of this ordinance?" add the phrase: "Is your opinion (please circle your choice) positive, neutral or negative?"
l.
No. 38 - after the phrase, "If Yes," add the words: "Is your opinion (please circle your choice): positive or negative?"
m. n.
No. 45 - ask the juror to list the top two programs. Nos. 55 & 56, the second set - eliminate these questions.
The parties are free to submit a new questionnaire to the court with the above changes and are free to delete questions that are better designed if asked during voir dire. SO ORDERED. Dated this 30th day of December, 2010. BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?