Plan Pros v. Zych et al

Filing 121

PROTECTIVE ORDER. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAE)

Download PDF
I N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA P la n Pros, Inc., P la in t iff vs. B r ia n Zych, et al., D e f e n d a n t s. § § § § § § § C a s e No.: 8 :0 8 C V 1 2 5 P R O T E C T I V E ORDER P u r s u a n t to the Memorandum and Order entered by the Court on July 8, 2009 [ D o c u m e n t # 94], and the Memorandum and Order entered by the court on August 21, 2009 [ D o c u m e n t # 116], the undersigned parties present this protective order, pursuant to which P la n Pros attorney shall be allowed to inspect and copy certain documents deemed c o n f id e n tia l and maintained by Defendant Ken Tinnes. In particular Plan Pros, a competitor o f Defendant sought to review over six years of Defendant Ken Tinnes' work product in c lu d in g professional designs, correspondence, marketing and pricing information. The C o u rt granted the request in part subject to entry of a "protective order limiting access to the rec o rds disclosed hereunder to counsel or counsel's representatives." By subsequent order, th e Court then clarified its meaning of "counsel's representatives" as "a person Plan Pros' C o u n se l retains who has architectural expertise, so long as that person is not associated with o n e of Tinnes' competitors and that person is made subject to the Protective Order the parties e n te r." This Court finds that the following Protective Order is appropriate. IT IS ORDERED, DECREED, AND ADJUDGED AS FOLLOWS: 1. T h e Defendant, Ken Tinnes shall allow Plaintiff's counsel Dana LeJune, and s u c h representative as he may retain, to inspect and copy the documents ordered produced b y the Court in the Memorandum and Order entered dated July 8, 2009 [Filing No. 94] and o n August 21, 2009 [Document # 116], so long as said person is not associated with one of T in n e s ' competitors. Such representative shall in writing consent to be bound by the terms Page 1 of 4 o f this protection order, prior to accessing, inspecting, and/or copying the records specified in the Memorandum and Order entered dated July 8, 2009 [Filing No. 94] and on August 21, 2 0 0 9 [Document # 116]. , namely the plans, documents and marketing materials described in parts (a), (b), and (c) excerpted from the Request for Production, and set forth in such O rd e r. The records shall not be accessed by any party other than Plaintiff's counsel and the c o n se n tin g representative who must be identified prior to the disclosure or inspection. 2. T h e material copied shall be marked "CONFIDENTIAL" and shall be m a in ta in e d by counsel for the Plaintiff separate from, and not commingled with, any other d o c u m e n t or items. 3. A n appropriate third party copying service may be utilized by the Plaintiff's c o u n se l to make the copies so long as such service affirms in writing to abide by this p ro te c tio n order and deliver the copies only to the LeJune Law firm. 4. E x c e p t as hereinafter provided or upon further order of the Court, no item p ro d u c e d nor any description or summary of its contents may be revealed to any person or e n tity except counsel for parties in this action and those secretaries or paralegals employed b y such counsel on a regular basis who are assisting counsel in this action; and the Court. (a ) A ny person receiving a copy of the material marked `C O N F I D E N T IA L " shall maintain the copy separate from and not commingled with, a n y other document or items not related to this case. (b) A ll copies shall be considered to be included within the term " c o n f id e n tial material" as used in this Order and possession and use of any copy shall b e subject to the terms of this Protective Order to the same extent as the original m a ter ial. 5. E a c h person receiving confidential material shall be subject to the terms of this P rotec tiv e Order. 6. A ll confidential material shall be viewed and/or used only for purposes of p re p a rin g and presenting this case. Prior to any public disclosure of the material at a hearing o r trial or in a motion to the court, counsel for Defendant, Ken Tinnes shall be notified of Page 2 of 4 w h a t material is intended to be disclosed and shall be provided an opportunity to object to th e intended disclosure. 7. A t the conclusion of this case all confidential material, including all copies, r e c e iv e d pursuant to this Order shall be returned to counsel for Defendant, Ken Tinnes unless o t h e r w i s e ordered by the Court. This Protective Order shall not terminate upon the c o n c lu s io n of this action, but shall continue until the further order of the Court, or until the D e f en d a n t, Ken Tinnes has waived confidentiality in writing. 8. T h e Court may impose sanctions with respect to any party or any party's a tto rn e y or any other person or entity improperly granting access to material subject to th is Protective Order. Any person or entity, whether or not a party violating the P ro tec tiv e Order, may be punished for contempt of Court. 9. a n d order. DATED this 2nd day of September, 2009. B Y THE COURT: /s / Lyle E. Strom __________________________________ L yle E. Strom, District Judge U n i te d States District Court A ll relief granted by this Order is subject to review and change upon motion A p p ro v e d as to form only: s /D a n a A. LeJune D a n a A. LeJune T X Bar No. 12188250 3 0 0 6 Brazos Street H o u s to n , Texas 77006 T e le p h o n e : (713) 942-9898 F a c sim ile : (713) 942-9899 A tto rn e y for Plaintiff P la n Pros, Inc. s/B re n t Nicholls B re n t Nicholls, No. 22146 K A S A B Y & NICHOLLS 3 0 0 S. 19 th Street, Suite #300 O m a h a , Nebraska 68102 T e le p h o n e : (402) 502-0600 F a c sim ile : (402) 614-5926 A tto rn e y for the Defendant, Ken Tinnes Page 3 of 4 Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?