Plan Pros v. Zych et al

Filing 132

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 95 Motion to Amend. Pretrial of this matter is rescheduled for: Friday, January 29, 2010, at 1:30 p.m. before the undersigned in chambers. Trial of this matter is rescheduled for Tuesday, February 16, 20 10, at 9:00 a.m. Courtroom No. 5, Roman L. Hruska United States Courhouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. All other deadlines in a the progression order filed March 16, 2009 81 remain in full force and effect. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PLAN PROS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BRIAN ZYCH, d/b/a ZYCH ) CONSTRUCTION, TRACY ZYCH, ) ZYCH CONSTRUCTION L.L.C., ) KENNETH TINNES, d/b/a KT ) DESIGN and KEN TINNES ) RESIDENTIAL DESIGN, CBS HOME ) REAL ESTATE COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) 8:08CV125 ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to amend progression order (Filing No. 95) and the Zych defendants' brief in opposition to plaintiff's second motion to amend progression order (Filing No. 101) and their supplemental response to plaintiff's motion to amend progression order (Filing No. 131). The Court has reviewed the motion and the responses Accordingly, and finds it should be granted in part. IT IS ORDERED: 1) Pretrial of this matter is rescheduled for: Friday, January 29, 2010, at 1:30 p.m. before the undersigned in chambers. 2) Trial of this matter is rescheduled for: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, at 9 a.m. Courtroom No. 5, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. 3) All other deadlines in the progression order filed March 16, 2009 (Filing No. 81) remain in full force and effect. DATED this 22nd day of September, 2009. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?