Meyer v. Degan et al

Filing 126

CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge - upon consent of parties, this case is transferred to Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken for final disposition. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (KBJ)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA KATHERINE MEYER, Plaintiff, v. SHEA DEGAN et. al., Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case Number: 08:8CV231 CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER OF REFERENCE CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, the parties in this case hereby voluntarily consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including the trial, and order the entry of a final judgment. Any appeal shall be taken to the United States court of appeals for this circuit. Signature of Attorney or Party /s/ Robert V. Broom /s/ Diane M. Carlson /s/ Jason Bruno Name of Party For Plaintiff Katherine Meyer For Defendants Shea Degan and Dan Conway For Defendants Eugene J. Graves, Jr. and Daniel Graves Date 11/13/09 11/12/09 11/16/09 ORDER OF REFERENCE Thomas D. Thal IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be referred to the Honorable ___________________ken ______________________, United States Magistrate Judge, for all further proceedings and the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 and the foregoing consent of the parties. 11/18/2009 _____________________________ Date ____________________________________________________ United States District Judge NOTE: RETURN THIS FORM TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT ONLY IF ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED ON THIS FORM TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. k:\clerk\proc\forms\consent.frm 08/15/03

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?