Meyer v. Degan et al

Filing 66

ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for an extension of time 65 is granted. An extension of time to file a response to the Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions filed by Defendants Eugene J. Graves, Jr. and Daniel Graves 57 and the Stipulation of the parties agreeing to the entry of an Order granting Plaintiff an extension of time to respond to said motion from the current due date of March 27, 2009, to and including April 6, 2009. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (KBJ)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA KATHERINE E. MEYER, Plaintiff, vs. SHEA DEGAN, DANIEL P. CONWAY, JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOE II, JOHN DOE III, JOHN DOE IV, EUGENE J. GRAVES, JR. and DANIEL GRAVES, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:08CV 231 ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion (Filing #65) to Extend Time for Plaintiff to Respond to the Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions filed by Defendants Eugene J. Graves, Jr. and Daniel Graves (Filing #57) and the Stipulation of the parties agreeing to the entry of an Order granting Plaintiff an extension of time to respond to said motion from the current due date of March 27, 2009, to and including April 6, 2009. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is hereby granted an extension of time to file a response to the Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions filed by Defendants Eugene J. Graves, Jr. and Daniel Graves (Filing #57) and the Stipulation of the parties agreeing to the entry of an Order granting Plaintiff an extension of time to respond to said motion from the current due date of March 27, 2009, to and including April 6, 2009. DATED this 24th day of March, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?