Meyer v. Degan et al

Filing 67

ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for an extension of time to file a response to the Motion for Summary Judgment 64 is granted. A Response to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 45 filed by Shea Degan, Daniel P. Conway and John Does I through I V, and the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Eugene J. Graves, Jr. and Daniel Graves 53 from the current due dates of April 6, 2009 and April 1, 2009, respectively, to and including April 13, 2009. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (KBJ)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA KATHERINE E. MEYER, Plaintiff, vs. SHEA DEGAN, DANIEL P. CONWAY, JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOE II, JOHN DOE III, JOHN DOE IV, EUGENE J. GRAVES, JR. and DANIEL GRAVES, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:08CV 231 ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion (Filing #64) to Extend Time for Plaintiff to Respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Shea Degan, Daniel P. Conway and John Does I through IV (Filing #45) and the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Eugene J. Graves, Jr. and Daniel Graves (Filing #53) and the Stipulation of the parties agreeing to the entry of an Order granting Plaintiff an extension of time to respond to both of said motions from the current due dates of April 6, 2009 and April 1, 2009, respectively, to and including April 13, 2009. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is hereby granted an extension of time to file a response to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Shea Degan, Daniel P. Conway and John Does I through IV (Filing #45) and the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Eugene J. Graves, Jr. and Daniel Graves (Filing #53) from the current due dates of April 6, 2009 and April 1, 2009, respectively, to and including April 13, 2009. DATED this 23rd day of March, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?