Lustgraaf v. Behrens et al

Filing 387

ORDER granting the parties' (383) Motions for Leave in case 8:08-cv-00335-JMG-CRZ; (378) Motion for Leave in case 8:08-cv-00399-JMG-CRZ; granting (369) Motion for Leave in case 8:08-cv-00436-JMG-CRZ; granting (349) Motion for Leave in cas e 8:09-cv-00013-JMG-CRZ; granting (289) Motion for Leave in case 8:09-cv-00044-JMG-CRZ. The above captioned cases will not be referred to bankruptcy at this time. Member Cases: 8:08-cv-00335-JMG-CRZ, 8:08-cv-00399-JMG-CRZ, 8:08-cv-00436-JMG-CRZ, 8:09-cv-00013-JMG-CRZ, 8:09-cv-00044-JMG-CRZOrdered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MARLIN LUSTGRAAF, 8:08-CV-335 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER SUNSET FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., and BRYAN S. BEHRENS, Defendants. JEAN (J.P.) POOLE & DEE POOLE, TRUSTEES OF THE POOLE FAMILY TRUST, 8:08-CV-399 Plaintiffs, ORDER vs. SUNSET FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., and BRYAN S. BEHRENS, Defendants. BARBARA M. VACANTI, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MILO VACANTI, 8:08-CV-436 Plaintiff, ORDER vs. SUNSET FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., and BRYAN S. BEHRENS, Defendants. WILLIAM GREEN AND JOANN GREEN, 8:09-CV-13 Plaintiffs, vs. ORDER SUNSET FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., and BRYAN S. BEHRENS, Defendants. BARBARA M. VACANTI, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MILO VACANTI, 8:09-CV-44 Plaintiff, ORDER vs. SUNSET FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., and BRYAN S. BEHRENS, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the motions for leave jointly filed by the plaintiffs and defendant and third-party plaintiff Sunset Financial Services requesting that the Court enter an order determining that they may voluntarily dismiss their claims against defendant Bryan S. Behrens, and that the case need not be referred to the bankruptcy court based on Behrens' pending bankruptcy proceeding. Case no. 8:08-cv-335 filing 383; case no. 8:08cv-399 filing 378; case no. 8:08-cv-436 filing 369; case no. 8:09-cv-13 filing 349; case no. 8:09-cv-44 filing 289. The motions will be granted. The Court agrees with the filing parties that they are not precluded by the automatic bankruptcy stay from voluntarily dismissing their claims against Behrens, as such a dismissal is not a "continuation" of a proceeding against the debtor within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. ยง 362(a)(1). See Dennis v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc., 860 F.2d 871, 872 (8th Cir. 1988); see also O'Donnell v. Vencor Inc., 466 F.3d 1104, 1110-11 (9th Cir. 2006). In light of the parties' -2- representation that the claims against Behrens are to be voluntarily dismissed, the Court elects not to refer this matter to the bankruptcy court at this time. The parties are advised, however, that for jurisdictional reasons, Behrens should be dismissed as a party to each of the above-captioned cases before the Court can act on the parties' other claims. The parties are invited to do so as soon as is practicable. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties' motions for leave (case no. 8:08-cv-335 filing 383; case no. 8:08-cv-399 filing 378; case no. 8:08-cv-436 filing 369; case no. 8:09-cv-13 filing 349; case no. 8:09-cv-44 filing 289) are granted. 2. The above-captioned cases bankruptcy at this time. will not be referred to Dated this 11th day of June, 2013. BY THE COURT: John M. Gerrard United States District Judge -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?