Lustgraaf v. Behrens et al

Filing 91

ORDER granting 90 Motion to Extend Response Dates for Defendants Sunset Financial Services, Inc., and Kansas City Life Insurance Company. The Defendant Sunset Financial Services, Inc., shall respond to the Plaintiffs Motion to Alter, Amend or Vaca te the Courts March 23, 2009, Ruling to Permit the Filing of a Proposed Second Amended Complaint (Filing No. 83 ) by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before April 30, 2009; The Plaintiff shall reply to the Defendant Sunset Finan cial Services, Inc.s response to Plaintiffs Motion to Alter, Amend or Vacate (Filing No. 83 ) by filing his brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before May 18, 2009; The Defendant Kansas City Life Insurance Company shall reply to the Plaintiff s response in opposition to Kansas City Lifes Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 77 ) by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before April 30, 2009; The Defendant Kansas City Life Insurance Company shall respond to the Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend (Filing No. 86) by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before April 30, 2009; and The Plaintiff shall reply to the Defendant Kansas City Lifes response to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend (Filing No. 86 ) by filing his brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before May 18, 2009. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MARLIN LUSTGRAAF, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SUNSET FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., ) KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE ) COMPANY, and BRYAN S. ) BEHRENS, ) ) Defendants. ) 8:08CV335 ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Defendants Sunset Financial Services, Inc., and Kansas City Life Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion to Extend Response Dates (Filing No. 90). The Defendants seek to extend deadlines for filing responses and replies to various motions pending before this Court. The Defendants assert in their motion that the Plaintiff's counsel does not oppose the motion. The Court finds the motion should be granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Defendants Sunset Financial Services, Inc., and Kansas City Life Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion to Extend Response Dates (Filing No. 90) is granted; 2. The Defendant Sunset Financial Services, Inc., shall respond to the Plaintiff's Motion to Alter, Amend or Vacate the Court's March 23, 2009, Ruling to Permit the Filing of a Proposed Second Amended Complaint (Filing No. 83) by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before April 30, 2009; 3. The Plaintiff shall reply to the Defendant Sunset Financial Services, Inc.'s response to Plaintiff's Motion to Alter, Amend or Vacate (Filing No. 83) by filing his brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before May 18, 2009; 4. The Defendant Kansas City Life Insurance Company shall reply to the Plaintiff's response in opposition to Kansas City Life's Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 77) by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before April 30, 2009; 5. The Defendant Kansas City Life Insurance Company shall respond to the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend (Filing No. 86) by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before April 30, 2009; and 6. The Plaintiff shall reply to the Defendant Kansas City Life's response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend (Filing No. 86) by filing his brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before May 18, 2009. DATED this 22nd day of April, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?