Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al

Filing 43

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(1) and (6)- The Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Filing No. 42 ) is granted. The Plaintiff shall reply to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) and (6) (Filing No. 34 ) on or before April 27, 2009. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and SECRETARY JANET NAPOLITANO, In Her Official Capacity, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NUMBER 08:08CV336 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(1) and (6) THIS MATTER CAME BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Filing No. 42). The Plaintiff requests additional time up to and including April 27, 2009 to reply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) and (6) (Filing No. 34). The Defendants do not oppose the Motion. IT IS ORDERED: 1. granted; and 2. The Plaintiff shall reply to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP The Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Filing No. 42) is 12(b)(1) and (6) (Filing No. 34) on or before April 27, 2009. DATED THIS 8th day of April, 2009. BY THE COURT: BY: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?