Poole et al v. Behrens et al

Filing 93

ORDER - The Defendants Sunset Financial Services, Inc., and Kansas City LifeInsurance Company's Unopposed Motion to Extend Response Dates 92 is granted. The Defendant Sunset Financial Services, Inc., shall respond to the Plaintiffs' Moti on to Alter, Amend or Vacate the Court's March 23, 2009, Ruling to Permit the Filing of a Proposed Second Amended Complaint 84 by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before April 30, 2009. The Plaintiffs shall reply to the D efendant Sunset Financial Services, Inc.'s response to Plaintiff's Motion to Alter, Amend or Vacate 84 by filing their brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before May 18, 2009. The Defendant Kansas City Life Insurance Company shall reply to the Plaintiffs response in opposition to Kansas City Life's Motion to Dismiss 78 by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before April 30, 2009. The Defendant Kansas City Life Insurance Company shall respond to the P laintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend 88 by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before April 30, 2009. The Plaintiffs shall reply to the Defendant Kansas City Life's response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend 88 by filing their brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before May 18, 2009. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JAE)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JEAN (J.P.) POOLE and DEE POOLE, ) Trustees of the Poole Family Trust, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) SUNSET FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., ) KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE ) COMPANY, and BRYAN S. ) BEHRENS, ) ) Defendants. ) 8:08CV399

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Defendants Sunset Financial Services, Inc., and Kansas City Life Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion to Extend Response Dates (Filing No. 92). The Defendants seek to extend deadlines for filing responses and replies to various motions pending before this Court. The Defendants assert in their motion that the Plaintiffs' counsel does not oppose the motion. The Court finds the motion should be granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Defendants Sunset Financial Services, Inc., and Kansas City Life

Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion to Extend Response Dates (Filing No. 92) is granted; 2. The Defendant Sunset Financial Services, Inc., shall respond to the Plaintiffs'

Motion to Alter, Amend or Vacate the Court's March 23, 2009, Ruling to Permit the Filing of a Proposed Second Amended Complaint (Filing No. 84) by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before April 30, 2009;

3.

The Plaintiffs shall reply to the Defendant Sunset Financial Services, Inc.'s

response to Plaintiff's Motion to Alter, Amend or Vacate (Filing No. 84) by filing their brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before May 18, 2009; 4. The Defendant Kansas City Life Insurance Company shall reply to the

Plaintiffs' response in opposition to Kansas City Life's Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 78) by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before April 30, 2009; 5. The Defendant Kansas City Life Insurance Company shall respond to the

Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend (Filing No. 88) by filing its brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before April 30, 2009; and 6. The Plaintiffs shall reply to the Defendant Kansas City Life's response to

Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend (Filing No. 88) by filing their brief and index of evidence, if any, on or before May 18, 2009.

DATED this 22nd day of April, 2009. BY THE COURT:

s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge

2