Keith M. Raml v. Creighton University

Filing 81

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- The Plaintiff is not granted leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis; and This determination is without prejudice to the filing of a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and an affidavit meeting the requirements of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA KEITH M. RAML, Plaintiff, v. CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 8:08CV419 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the clerk's memorandum regarding the Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status (Filing No. 79) and the Plaintiff's pro se notice of appeal (Filing No. 78). The Plaintiff has not complied with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24. Specifically, the Plaintiff has neither filed a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis nor an accompanying affidavit that meets the specific requirements of Rule 24. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Plaintiff is not granted leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis; and 2. This determination is without prejudice to the filing of a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and an affidavit meeting the requirements of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24. DATED this 29th day of December, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?