United States of America v. $34,000 in United States Currency

Filing 30

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: The parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) with the clerk of the court which will fully dispose of the case and provide a copy to the undersigned judge on or before February 15, 2010. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. The nonjury trial scheduled for January 21, 2010, is canceled. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice in accordance with NECivR 41.1. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. $34,000.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:08CV446 ORDER Upon notice of settlement given to the undersigned judge on January 14, 2009, by the attorney for the plaintiff, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) with the clerk of the court which will fully dispose of the case and provide a copy to the undersigned judge on or before February 15, 2010. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. 2. 3. The nonjury trial scheduled for January 21, 2010, is canceled. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice in accordance with NECivR 41.1. DATED this 19th day of January, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?