Ervin & Smith Advertising et al v. Ervin et al

Filing 29

ORDER. The defendants' request for jury trial ( 27 at p. 29/31) is granted, and this case will be designated on the docket as a jury action as to all the issues so triable. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ERVIN & SMITH ADVERTISING AND PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM ERVIN, THOMAS ERVIN, LYNNETTE ROXBURGH, DAVID ZEMUNSKI, and BTM, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:08CV459 ORDER The parties report that they disagree on whether a trial by jury is available in this case. Plaintiff states it does not intend to demand a jury trial. Defendants William Ervin, Thomas Ervin and BTM, Inc. moved to dismiss the complaint (the motion is still pending) and have not yet answered or filed any jury demand. Defendants Roxburgh and Zemunski filed answers, but did not demand a jury trial at that time. Paragraph VIII.C.3. of the planning report, filed December 22, 2008 (Doc. 27 at p. 29/31), advises: "The Defendants hereby demand a jury trial on all issues. Plaintiff objects to Defendants' jury demand as out of time." Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(b), on any issue triable of right by a jury, a party may demand a jury trial by: (1) serving the other parties with a written demand -- which may be included in a pleading -- no later than 10 days after the last pleading directed to the issue is served; and (2) filing the demand in accordance with Rule 5(d). Assuming, without deciding, that the defendants' jury demand was untimely, the court finds that the defendants should be granted relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 39(b). Rule 39(b) provides: "Issues on which a jury trial is not properly demanded are to be tried by the court. But the court may, on motion, order a jury trial on any issue for which a jury might have been demanded." Construing the statement1 "[t]he Defendants hereby demand a jury trial on all issues," as a motion for jury trial, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 39(b), IT IS ORDERED that the defendants' request for jury trial is granted, and this case will be designated on the docket as a jury action as to all the issues so triable. DATED December 23, 2008. BY THE COURT: s/ F.A. Gossett United States Magistrate Judge The preferred practice would be to follow the procedure set out in Fed. R. Civ. P. 38 and NECivR 38.1. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?