Ervin & Smith Advertising et al v. Ervin et al

Filing 67

ORDER approving 65 Stipulation for Dismissal and the relief requested therein is granted. Plaintiffs claims against Defendant David Zemunski are dismissed with prejudice; The parties will pay their own costs and attorney fees; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the caption in this case by terminating David Zemunski as a defendant. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (PCV, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ERVIN & SMITH ADVERTISING AND PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM ERVIN, THOMAS ERVIN, LYNNETTE ROXBURGH, DAVID ZEMUNSKI, and BTM, INC., d/b/a ERVIN GROUP, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 8:08CV459 ORDER This matter is before the Court on the joint motion of Plaintiff Ervin & Smith Advertising and Public Relations, Inc. and Defendant David Zemunski to approve settlement and dismiss Zemunski (Filing No. 65). The stipulation complies with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the Court finds that it should be approved. Further, the Court finds that the parties should bear their own costs and attorney fees. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (Filing No. 65) is approved, and the relief requested therein is granted; Plaintiff's claims against Defendant David Zemunski are dismissed with prejudice; The parties will pay their own costs and attorney fees; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the caption in this case by terminating David Zemunski as a defendant. 2. 3. 4. DATED this 1st day of October, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?