Rangel et al v. Union Pacific Railroad

Filing 13

ORDER granting 12 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order ( from USDC-Texas, Eastern District, Case No. 9:07CV211 - TH - JKG ). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie. (JAE, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION ROBERT L. RANGEL, ET AL. Vs. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:07CV211 ORDER On January 17, 2008, Plaintiffs filed an Agreed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order (document #12). Plaintiffs assert that the parties have agreed to modify deadlines in the case without affecting the trial date. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Agreed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order (document #12) is GRANTED. The following deadlines are modified as set out below: August 4, 2008 Date parties should be prepared to try the case (docket call to be set by Judge Heartfield) Motions in limine, Joint Final Pretrial Order, jointly proposed jury instructions and form of the verdict and objections to depositions or exhibits Pretrial disclosures Response to dispositive motions (including Daubert motions). Responses to motions that are filed prior to the dispositive motion deadline shall be due in accordance with Local Rule CV-7(e). 1 July 14, 2008 July 7, 2008 June 27, 2008 June 13, 2008 Filing dispositive motions and any other motions that may require a hearing (including Daubert motions) Discovery deadline Mediation deadline Respondent to designate expert witnesses and provide FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) report Party with burden of proof on the issue to designate expert witnesses and provide FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) report May 30, 2008 May 23, 2008 May 19, 2008 April 18, 2008 So ORDERED and SIGNED this 23 day of January, 2008. ____________________________ JUDITH K. GUTHRIE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?