Slupkowski v. United States of America
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 6 Motion to consolidate cases. Slupkowski is permitted to consolidate these matters. No later than January 30, 2009, Slupkowski shall file an amended complaint in Case No. 8:08CV472. The amended complaint shall contai n all of Slupkowski's claims, including those presented in Case No. 8:08CV471. Any claims not contained in the amended complaint will be deemed abandoned. In the event that Slupkowski files an amended complaint in accordance with this Memorandum and Order, Case No. 8:08CV471 will be dismissed. However, the filing fee paid in Case No. 8:08CV471 will not be refunded. In the event that Slupkowski fails to file an amended complaint by January 29, 2009, both of these cases will be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order and for failure to prosecute diligently. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines set for 1/30/2009: deadline for Slupkowski to file amended complaint. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JAB) Modified on 12/31/2008 to include copy mailed text (BMH).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA STANLEY A. SLUPKOWSKI, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et ) al., ) ) Respondent. ) ) STANLEY A. SLUPKOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:08CV471
8:08CV472
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
These matters are before the court on Stanley A. Slupkowski's ("Slupkowski") Motion "for both proceedings to be held in same court and same Jurist." (Case No. 8:08CV471, Filing No. 5; Case No. 8:08CV472, Filing No. 6.) The court construes this Motion as a motion to consolidate Case No. 8:08CV471 and Case No. 8:08CV472.1
Slupkowski filed two separate cases, Case No. 8:08CV471 and Case No. 8:08CV472, on October 17, 2008. In his Motion, Slupkowski states that these cases "support each other." (Case No. 8:08CV471, Filing No. 5 at CM/ECF p. 1; Case No. 8:08CV472, Filing No. 6 at CM/ECF p. 1.)
1
The court has carefully reviewed Slupkowski's Motion and will permit Slupkowski to consolidate these matters into one case. No later than January 29, 2009, Slupkowski shall file an amended complaint in Case No. 8:08CV472. The amended complaint shall contain all of Slupkowski's claims, including those presented in Case No. 8:08CV471. Any claims not contained in the amended complaint will be deemed abandoned. In the event that Slupkowski files an amended complaint in accordance with this Memorandum and Order, Case No. 8:08CV471 will be dismissed. However, the filing fee paid in Case No. 8:08CV471 will not be refunded. In the event that Slupkowski fails to file an amended complaint by January 29, 2009, both of these cases will be dismissed for failure to comply with court orders.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Slupkowski's Motion to consolidate cases (case no. 8:08CV471, filing no. 5; case no. 8:08CV472, filing no. 6.) is granted. 2. Slupkowski is permitted to consolidate these matters. No later than January 30, 2009, Slupkowski shall file an amended complaint in Case No. 8:08CV472. The amended complaint shall contain all of Slupkowski's claims, including those presented in Case No. 8:08CV471. Any claims not contained in the amended complaint will be deemed abandoned. 3. In the event that Slupkowski files an amended complaint in accordance with this Memorandum and Order, Case No. 8:08CV471 will be dismissed. However, the filing fee paid in Case No. 8:08CV471 will not be refunded. 4. In the event that Slupkowski fails to file an amended complaint by January 29, 2009, both of these cases will be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order and for failure to prosecute diligently.
2
5. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in Case No. 8:08CV472 with the following text: January 30, 2009: deadline for Slupkowski to file amended complaint. December 30, 2008. BY THE COURT: s/Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?