United States of America v. Latvian Tower Condominium, et al.

Filing 42

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding pending motions. The defendants' unopposed motion, (filing no. 37 ), is granted, and the defendants shall file their response to the intervenors' complaint on or before September 28, 2009. The defendants� 39; unopposed motion, (filing no. 38 ), is granted, and the defendants shall file their amended answer to the government's complaint on or before September 28, 2009. The parties' joint motions to extend, (filing nos. 40 and 41 ), are gr anted, and the deadlines for disclosing experts and their reports are continued as follows: By the plaintiff/intervening plaintiffs: October 12, 2009. By the defendants: November 12, 2009. Plaintiff/intervening plaintiffs' rebuttal expert(s): November 26, 2009. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, a nd JAMES BROWN, and JEFFREY DAUBMEN, Plaintiffs/Intervenors v. LATVIAN TOWER CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., and KARL TEGTMEYER, Defendants. IT IS ORDERED: 1) The defendants' unopposed motion, (filing no. 37), is granted, and the defendants shall file their response to the intervenors' complaint on or before September 28, 2009. The defendants' unopposed motion, (filing no. 38), is granted, and the defendants shall file their amended answer to the government's complaint on or before September 28, 2009. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:08CV489 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 2) 3) The parties' joint motions to extend, (filing nos. 40 and 41), are granted, and the deadlines for disclosing experts and their reports are continued as follows: By the plaintiff/intervening plaintiffs: October 12, 2009 By the defendants: November 12, 2009 Plaintiff/intervening plaintiffs' rebuttal expert(s): November 26, 2009 DATED this 28th day of September, 2009. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?