Loppnow v. United States of America et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order.Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAE, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DEAN R. LOPPNOW, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, and JEFF STOTKO, Special Agent, IRS, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:08CV510
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on its own motion. On November 25, 2008, the court entered a Memorandum and Order requiring Plaintiff "to pay the balance of the filing fee, or alternatively, to submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit in support" no later than December 29, 2008. (Filing No. 4) Plaintiff was warned that failure to "either pay the remainder of the filing fee or to submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis" would result in dismissal "without further notice and without prejudice." (Id.) Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, has not filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and has not filed any other response to the court's Memorandum and Order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. 2. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. January 13, 2009. BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?