Prism Technologies v. Research in Motion, Ltd. et al
ORDER striking 124 Objection. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs motion 127 is granted; Filing No. 124 is stricken without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (PCV, ) Modified on 2/18/2010 to reflect that Objection 124 is stricken, not granted. (PCV, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RESEARCH IN MOTION LTD, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________)
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to strike CM/ECF Docket No. 124 (Filing No. 127). finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, The Court
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion is granted; Filing No. 124 is stricken without prejudice. DATED this 18th day of February, 2010. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?