Green et al v. Sunset Financial Services, Inc. et al

Filing 232

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Defendant Sunset Financial Services, Inc.'s Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Order (Filing No. 223 ) are overruled. The Memorandum and Order (Filing No. 214 ) is affirmed. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
WILLIAM GREEN and JOANN
GREEN,

)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
SUNSET FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., )
and BRYAN S. BEHRENS,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

8:09CV13

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Defendant Sunset’s Objections to the
Magistrate Judge’s Order and Memorandum Regarding Sunset’s Motion to Compel and
Request for Oral Argument (Filing No. 223). The Court has reviewed the Magistrate
Judge’s Memorandum and Order (Filing No. 214), the briefs and indexes of evidence
submitted by the parties before the entry of that Memorandum and Order (Filing Nos. 176,
177, 178, 185, 186, 188, 194, 195), and the arguments in support of and in opposition to
the pending Objections (Filing Nos. 223, 231).
In an appeal from a magistrate judge's order on a pretrial matter contemplated by
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), a district court may set aside any part of the magistrate judge's
order shown to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed. R.
Civ. P. 72(a). After reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, the Court finds that
Magistrate Judge Gossett’s order is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

The

Memorandum and Order was thorough, thoughtful, well-reasoned, and supported by
applicable law. Accordingly, it will be affirmed.

IT IS ORDERED:
1.

The Defendant Sunset Financial Services, Inc.’s Objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Memorandum and Order (Filing No. 223) are overruled; and
2.

The Memorandum and Order (Filing No. 214) is affirmed.

DATED this 25th day of April, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
S/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge

2