Crawford v. Van Horn et al

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Memorandum and Order 9 . 1. Plaintiff failed to respond to the court's April 3, 2009, Memorandum and Order requiring that he provide the court with a current address. This action is therefore dismissed without prejudice and all pending motions are denied as moot. 2. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA R A Y M O N D L. CRAWFORD, Plaintiff, v. S U Z A N VAN HORN, et al., D e fe n d a n t s . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8 :0 9 C V 6 6

M EM ORANDUM AND ORDER

T h is matter is before the court on its own motion. On April 3, 2009, the court o rd ered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to in fo rm the court of his current address. (Filing No. 9.) In its Memorandum and Order, th e court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to show cause or to update his address by May 4 , 2009, would result in dismissal without further notice. (Id.) Plaintiff has not re sp o n d e d to this court's previous Memorandum and Order nor has Plaintiff updated h is address with the court. This case is therefore dismissed without prejudice. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. P lain tiff failed to respond to the court's April 3, 2009, Memorandum and

O rd er requiring that he provide the court with a current address. This action is th erefo re dismissed without prejudice and all pending motions are denied as moot. 2. an d Order. May 11, 2009. B Y THE COURT: A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum

s/R ich a rd G. Kopf United States District Judge