James v. State of Nebraska et al

Filing 100

ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Defendants' Resistance to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 99 ) is granted and plaintiff shall have until Friday, June 17, 2011 to file her reply brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ELAINE JAMES, M.D., Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF NEBRASKA; NEBRASKA BOARD OF MEDICINE & SURGERY; JOANN SCHAEFER, M.D., in her personal and official capacity; HELEN L. MEEKS, in her personal and official capacity; DAVID DRYBURGH, in their personal capacities and their official capacities as members of the Nebraska Board of Medicine and Surgery; CARL V. SMITH, M.D.; VONN E. ROBERTS, M.D.; LARRY E. BRAGG, M.D.; MICHAEL SITORIUS, M.D.; ARTHUR WEAVER, D.O.; MERLE HENKENIUS; KAREN HIGGINS, M.D., in their personal capacities and their official capacities as members of the Nebraska Board of Medicine and Surgery; NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH, an agency in the State of Nebraska, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:09CV112 ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Elaine James’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Defendants’ Resistance to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 99). Plaintiff has advised that defendants do not object to an extension. IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Defendants’ Resistance to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 99) is granted and plaintiff shall have until Friday, June 17, 2011 to file her reply brief. DATED this 14th day of June, 2011. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?