Warbelton et al v. Houston, et al.

Filing 48

ORDER denying as moot 47 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAE)

Warbelton et al v. Houston, et al.

Doc. 48

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ERIC WARBELTON, and JOSE SILVA, Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT HOUSTON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:09CV132

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Jose Silva's Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Filing No. 47.) The court dismissed this matter with prejudice and entered Judgment against Plaintiff on July 20, 2010.1 (Filing Nos. 44 and 45.) Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel is denied as moot. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (filing no. 47) is denied as moot. DATED this 26th day of July, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge

The court notes that Plaintiff filed his Motion to Appoint Counsel and an untimely Response to D e f e n d a n t s ' Motion for Summary Judgment on July 19, 2010. (Filing Nos. 46 and 47.) These documents were n o t entered until after the court entered Judgment in this mater. (See Docket Sheet.) Nevertheless, the court h a s carefully reviewed Plaintiff's untimely Response. The court concludes that this Response does not change t h e court's Memorandum and Order and Judgment dismissing this matter.

1

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or W e b sites. The U.S. District Court for the District o f Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they p r o v i d e on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The c o u r t accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases t o work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.

Dockets.Justia.com