Harris et al v. D. Scott Carruthers & Assoc. et al

Filing 106

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 102 Motion to Compel; The defendants shall disclose their net worth to the plaintiffs; The defendants shall disclose the number of people who were sent letters similar to Exhibits A-D of the Amended Compla int (Filing No. 13-2) to the plaintiffs, but the defendants are not required at this time to disclose the names or contact information of those people; and The motion is denied in all other respects; denying without prejudice 104 Motion to Compel; granting 97 Motion to Extend; The plaintiffs shall file a motion for class certification by Friday, April 9, 2010, in which the plaintiffs shall set forth specific facts supporting class certification; The Court will hold a planning conference on T hursday, April 15, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. at which the Court will determine whether the plaintiffs have set forth sufficient information to justify holding a class certification hearing and, if so, to set a class certification hearing. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (ADB, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LARAINE HARRIS and ERIC MATTEA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) D. SCOTT CARRUTHERS & ASSOC., ) REGENT ASSET MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, ) and UNITED CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORP.,) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________) 8:09CV154 ORDER This matter is before the Court after the conference the Court held with the parties today. IT IS ORDERED: 1) The plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery Accordingly, responses (Filing No. 102) is granted in part and denied in part: a. b. The defendants shall disclose their net worth to the plaintiffs; The defendants shall disclose the number of people who were sent letters similar to Exhibits A-D of the Amended Complaint (Filing No. 13-2) to the plaintiffs, but the defendants are not required at this time to disclose the names or contact information of those people; and The motion is denied in all other respects; The plaintiffs' motion to compel inspection (Filing c. 2) No. 104) is denied without prejudice; and 3) The plaintiffs' motion to extend time to complete class discovery (Filing No. 97) is granted: a. The plaintiffs shall file a motion for class certification by Friday, April 9, 2010, in which the plaintiffs shall set forth specific facts supporting class certification; b. The Court will hold a planning conference on Thursday, April 15, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. at which the Court will determine whether the plaintiffs have set forth sufficient information to justify holding a class certification hearing and, if so, to set a class certification hearing. DATED this 17th day of March, 2010. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?