Harris et al v. D. Scott Carruthers & Assoc. et al
ORDER that plaintiffs' motion to inspect 36 is denied without prejudice. Defendants' motion to strike 62 is denied as moot. Plaintiffs' motion to compel deposition of witnesses 75 is denied without prejudice. The Court withholds judgment on plaintiffs' motion to compel responses to deposition questions 83 , in anticipation of defendants filing a brief opposing that motion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JSF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LARAINE HARRIS and ERIC MATTEA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) D. SCOTT CARRUTHERS & ASSOC., ) REGENT ASSET MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, ) and UNITED CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORP.,) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________)
This matter is before the Court to resolve several discovery motions outstanding in this case, which the parties discussed at today's hearing. IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiffs' motion to inspect (Filing No. 36) is
denied without prejudice; 2) Defendants' motion to strike (Filing No. 62) is
denied as moot; and 3) Plaintiffs' motion to compel deposition of
witnesses (Filing No. 75) is denied without prejudice. 4) The Court withholds judgment on plaintiffs' motion
to compel responses to deposition questions (Filing No. 83), in anticipation of defendants filing a brief opposing that motion. DATED this 10th day of February, 2010. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?