McKinley v. Omaha Police Department
ORDER denying 12 Motion to Reopen Case. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SHANE MATTHEW McKINLEY, Plaintiff, v. OMAHA POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to reopen case (Filing No. 12). This matter was dismissed on
November 2, 2009, because plaintiff failed to amend his complaint (Filing Nos. 10 and 11). In his motion, plaintiff states that he
submitted an amended complaint, but the clerk of the court docketed it as a new case, Case No. 8:09CV371 (Filing No. 12). Indeed, a review of the Court's records shows that Case No. 8:09CV371 deals with the same issues and sets forth the same or similar claims as this matter (Filing No. 1; Case No. 8:09CV371, Filing No. 1). That matter is still open and plaintiff has been
directed to complete service of process by June 10, 2010 (Case No. 8:09CV371, Filing No. 17). In short, the Court is permitting
plaintiff the opportunity to pursue his claims in Case No. 8:09CV371, and sees no reason to reopen this duplicative matter. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to reopen case (Filing No. 12) is denied. DATED this 14th day of April, 2010. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?