Sanchez v. Dakota County, Nebraska et al

Filing 44

ORDER granting 39 the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend( Amended Complaint due by 3/3/2010.) The defendant's 22 Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ALANA CRUTCHER-SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, JAMES L. WAGNER, Dakota County Sheriff in his official capacity and personally, and RODNEY HERRON, in his official capacity, and personally, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:09CV288 ORDER This matter is before the court on defendants' motion to dismiss, Filing No. 22, and plaintiff's motion for leave to amend her complaint, Filing No. 39. The court has reviewed the request to amend as well as the briefs in support and in opposition. Filing No. 39, Attachment 1; Filing No. 43.1 The court finds the motion to amend should be granted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's motion to amend her complaint, Filing No. 39, is granted. Plaintiff shall file her complaint as a separate pleading within 5 days of the date of this order; and 2. Defendants' motion to dismiss, Filing No. 22, is denied as moot. DATED this 26th day of February, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief District Judge 1 Defendant's argue that plaintiff failed to separately file her brief in accordance with the Local Rules a n d also contend that they cannot determ in e who is actually representing plaintiff. Plaintiff is advised to m a k e s u r e she com p lie s with the Local Rules in the future. Only counsel adm itte d to practice in this jurisdiction or th o s e adm itt e d pro hac vice are authorized to represent the plaintiff in this case. The defendants can easily d e t e r m in e who is representing the plaintiff by looking at the docket sheet in CM/ECF.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?