Soyulmaz v. Sbarro, Inc.
ORDER granting 22 Motion to Extend. Deadlines extended as requested. Jury Trial continued to 3/15/2011 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2, Federal Building, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Judge Laurie Smith Camp. Pretrial Conference continued to 2/17/2011 at 11:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (CLS, )
-FG3 Soyulmaz v. Sbarro, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ZAFER BULDUK, Plaintiff, vs. SBARRO, INC., Defendant. VOLKAN SOYULMAZ, Plaintiff, vs. SBARRO, INC., Defendant. CHARLES ALLEY, Plaintiff, vs. SBARRO, INC., Defendant. KURSAT HAMZAOGLU, Plaintiff, vs. SBARRO, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
For good cause shown, I T IS ORDERED that the parties' Joint Motions to Extend Discovery and Summary J u d g m e n t Deadlines are granted, as follows: 1 . T h e deadline for filing motions for summary judgment is extended from S e p te m b e r 17, 2010 to November 16, 2010. 2. T h e deposition deadline is extended from August 16, 2010 to October 15, 2010.
3 . T h e deadline for serving pretrial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) is extended to February 1, 2011. 4 . M o tio n s in limine challenging the admissibility of expert testimony at trial under F e d . R. Evid. 702 shall be filed by November 10, 2010. 5 . T h e final pretrial conference is continued from December 17, 2010 to February 1 7 , 2011 at 11:00 AM, in chambers, 111 South 18th Plaza, Suite 2210, Roman L. Hruska U n ite d States Courthouse, Omaha, Nebraska. 6 . A jury trial is set to commence, at the court's call, during the week of March 15, 2 0 1 1 , in Omaha, Nebraska, before the Honorable Laurie Smith Camp. D A T E D August 3, 2010. B Y THE COURT: s / F.A. Gossett U n ite d States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?