Schaffart v. ONEOK, Inc.
ORDER granting 41 the Motion in Limine in case 8:09-cv-00367-LES -FG3; granting 49 Motion in Limine in case 8:09-cv-00368-LES -FG3 as to Paragraphs 1, 3, 4 and 5. The motion is denied without prejudice as to Paragraph 2. Member Cases: 8:09-cv-00367-LES -FG3, 8:09-cv-00368-LES -FG3Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR)
-FG3 Schaffart v. ONEOK, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA GAYE LYNN SCHAFFART, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ONEOK, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) JERRY PETERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ONEOK, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________)
This matter is before the Court on defendant's motion in limine (Filing No. 41 in 8:09CV367; Filing No. 49 in 8:09CV368), the brief of the defendants (Filing No. 42 in 8:09CV367; Filing No. 50 in 8:09CV368), and the response of the plaintiffs (Filing No. 58 in 8:09CV367; Filing No. 67 in 8:09CV368). In their filings, plaintiffs have conceded
Paragraphs 1, 3, 4 and 5 of defendant's motion, and the motion will be granted as to those paragraphs. The motion will be denied as to Paragraph 2 without prejudice to raising this objection during the course of the trial. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED: 1) The motion in limine is granted as to Paragraphs 1, 3, 4 and 5. 2) The motion is denied without prejudice as to Paragraph 2. DATED this 31st day of August, 2010. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?