Fuller et al v. United States of America
Filing
58
ORDER - The parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Kyoko I. Fuller, With Prejudice 57 is approved; All claims in the Amended Complaint 6 seeking the refund of penalties assessed against Kyoko I. Fuller under 26 U.S.C. § 6677 for th e 2001 and 2002 tax years, and all claims seeking the refund of interest paid on such penalties, shall be dismissed with prejudice; Kyoko I. Fuller is dismissed as a party plaintiff, and the clerk is instructed to remove Kyoko I. Fuller from the case caption; and The parties subject to this order will bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (KBJ)
-FG3 Fuller v. United States of America
Doc. 58
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JONATHAN E. FULLER AND KYOKO I. FULLER, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 8:09CV377
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Kyoko I. Fuller, With Prejudice (Filing No. 57). The stipulation complies with the
requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the Court concludes that it should be approved. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Kyoko I. Fuller, With Prejudice (Filing No. 57) is approved; All claims in the Amended Complaint (Filing No. 6) seeking the refund of penalties assessed against Kyoko I. Fuller under 26 U.S.C. § 6677for the 2001 and 2002 tax years, and all claims seeking the refund of interest paid on such penalties, shall be dismissed with prejudice; Kyoko I. Fuller is dismissed as a party plaintiff, and the clerk is instructed to remove Kyoko I. Fuller from the case caption; and The parties subject to this order will bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.
2.
3.
4.
DATED this 7th day of March, 2011. BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?