Criss et al v. Dakota County Board of Commissioners et al
Memorandum and ORDER adopting 123 Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation;denying 91 Defendants' Motion for Recusal. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (SMS, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
RICHARD CRISS, et al.,
COUNTY OF DAKOTA, NEBRASKA,
JAMES L. WAGNER, in his official and
individual capacities, and RODNEY
HERRON, in his official and individual
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Before the court is the Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Thomas D. Thalken, Filing No. 123. No objection has been filed to the Findings and
Recommendation. Pursuant to NECivR 72.2 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has
conducted a de novo review of the record and adopts the Findings and Recommendation
in its entirety.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
The Findings and Recommendation, Filing No. 123, is adopted in its entirety.
The defendants’ Motion for Recusal, Filing No. 91, is denied.
DATED this 21st day of June, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Chief District Judge
*This opinion m ay contain hyperlinks to other docum ents or W eb sites. The U.S. District Court for
the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recom m end, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services
or products they provide on their W eb sites. Likewise, the court has no agreem ents with any of these third
parties or their W eb sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any
hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to som e other site does not affect
the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?