Criss et al v. Dakota County Board of Commissioners et al

Filing 129

ORDER regarding Partial Dismissal by Plaintiff Amanda Navin granting 118 Stipulation for Dismissal. The claims of Plaintiff Amanda Navin f/k/a Amanda Ruhrer against Defendant James L. Wagner and Rodney Herron, in their Official and Individual Capa cities, are hereby dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this stipulation is without prejudice to, or affect upon, any of the remaining claims of Plaintiff Amanda Navin f/k/a Amanda Ruhrer or the claims of any other Plaintiffs to this action. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA RICHARD CRISS, AMANDA NAVIN f/k/a AMANDA RUHRER, KRYSTAL RAMIREZ, COLLEEN McMAHONLEVINE, ANNE CUTSINGER, RONALD FINK, JR., JOHN GILLES, DIANA MOCTEZUMA, HEATHER SHELBY f/k/a HEATHER SKOW, Plaintiffs, vs. COUNTY OF DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, JAMES L. WAGNER, RODNEY HERRON, in their Official and Individual Capacities, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 08: 09-cv-00387 ORDER REGARDING PARTIAL DISMISSAL BY PLAINTIFF AMANDA NAVIN THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to a Stipulation of Partial Dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared in this action filed May 18, 2011 [Document #118]. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the claims of Plaintiff Amanda Navin f/k/a Amanda Ruhrer against Defendant James L. Wagner and Rodney Herron, in their Official and Individual Capacities, are hereby dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this stipulation is without prejudice to, or affect upon, any of the remaining claims of Plaintiff Amanda Navin f/k/a Amanda Ruhrer or the claims of any other Plaintiffs to this action. Dated this 21st day of June, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon CHIEF DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?