Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. US Bank National Association

Filing 333

ORDER - Woodmen's Motion for Leave to Extend the Duration of Defendant Emil Busse's Deposition (Expedited) (Filing No. 318 ) is granted. Woodmen shall have two days of up to seven hours each to depose Busse. Defendant Emil C. Busse, Jr.,'s Expedited Motion to Amend Pleading (Filing No. 322 ) is granted. Busse shall have to on or before March 29, 2012, to file an amended answer. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (AOA)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ) U.S. BANCORP ASSET MANAGEMENT, ) U.S. BANCORP, and ) EMIL C. BUSSE, JR., ) ) Defendants. ) 8:09CV407 ORDER This matter is before the court on Woodmen’s Motion for Leave to Extend the Duration of Defendant Emil Busse’s Deposition (Expedited) (Filing No. 318) and Defendant Emil C. Busse, Jr.’s Expedited Motion to Amend Pleading (Filing No. 322). The court held a telephone conference on March 23, 2012. Woodmen was represented by Cathy S. Trent-Vilim, Mark E. Novotny, and Patrick G. Vipond. Busse was represented by Robert J. Hennessey. U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, and U.S. Bancorp were represented by Steve W. Gaskins and Richard J. Gilloon. Upon discussion of the matters with counsel, the court finds the motions should be granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Woodmen’s Motion for Leave to Extend the Duration of Defendant Emil Busse’s Deposition (Expedited) (Filing No. 318) is granted. Woodmen shall have two days of up to seven hours each to depose Busse. 2. Defendant Emil C. Busse, Jr.,’s Expedited Motion to Amend Pleading (Filing No. 322) is granted. Busse shall have to on or before March 29, 2012, to file an amended answer. DATED this 23rd day of March, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?