Schoemaker v. Sullivan

Filing 27

ORDER granting 25 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Response to Plaintiff's Sur-Reply Brief; and Defendant shall immediately file, as a separate docket entry, the brief attached to its motion. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JEREMY SCHOEMAKER, Plaintiff, v. DAVID SULLIVAN, individually and d/b/a BIG BLUE DOTS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 8:09CV441 ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Response to Plaintiff's Sur-Reply Brief (Filing No. 25). Plaintiff has objected to Defendant's motion, arguing its sur-reply does not raise new issues. Defendant asserts that Plaintiff has introduced a new theory for personal jurisdiction, citing five new cases in support of his theory. The proposed brief is attached to Defendant's motion. Plaintiff has objected to Defendant's motion, arguing its sur-reply does not raise new issues. In the interest of justice, the Court will grant leave to Defendant to file its response. The Court will not grant leave for further argument to either party. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Response to Plaintiff's Sur-Reply Brief (Filing No. 25) is granted; and 2. Defendant shall immediately file, as a separate docket entry, the brief attached to its motion. DATED this 22nd day of March, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?